Skip to content | Change text size 
Academic Staff
 

Evolutionary Ecology Laboratory

Research projects in the Evolutionary Ecology Lab address questions of adaptation and life-history evolution in a wide variety of organisms. Three project areas are under active investigation:


These projects are described in further detail in the links above.

Reproductive phenology and sexual allocation in flowering plants

gigantea mutant of A. thaliana

The theory of sex allocation explains how organisms evolve to distribute their reproductive investment among sons and daughters, or among male and female functions. From a few fundamentals of biology (such as the equivalence of male and female genetic contributions to sexually produced offspring), and from testable alternatives for the shape of 'gain curves' (functions that describe the fitness returns from resource investment), it is possible to predict a variety of reproductive features of organisms (Charnov 1982). Sexual allocation has been studied intensively in the past two decades, and the underlying theory has become a fundamental part of evolutionary biology.

The theory has not, however, been conspicuously successful in explaining basic reproductive patterns in flowering plants, especially the much smaller investment made in male function (flowering and pollen dispersal) compared to female function (flowering, fruit and seed maturation). Where does the shortfall lie? A feature of angiosperm reproduction that is ignored by standard sex allocation theory is the pronounced separation in time between male investment (early in the flowering season) and most female investment (later in a reproductive bout). A theory that incorporates reproductive phenology has been emerging in the 1990s (Burd and Head 1992; Ashman 1993; Brunet and Charlesworth 1995; Seger and Eckhart 1996; Sakai and Harada 1998), but theory is running far ahead of experimental efforts to test it.

We are conducting a project, funded by the Australian Research Council and headed by Dr Angela Baker, to test the role of reproductive phenology in sexual allocation. We are using well known floral-timing mutations of Arapidopsis thaliana (expressed in otherwise identical genetic backgrounds) to produce plants that differ in the temporal pattern of flowering. We will therefore be able to measure and assess the consequences (if any) of single genes on sex allocation.

Background information:

  • Ashman, T.-L. 1994. A dynamic perspective on the physiological cost of reproduction in plants. American Naturalist 144:300-316.
  • Brunet, J., and D. Charlesworth. 1995. Floral sex allocation in sequentially blooming plants. Evolution 49:70-79.
  • Burd, M., and G. Head. 1992. Phenological aspects of male and female function in hermaphroditic plants. American Naturalist 140:305-324.
  • Charnov, E. L. 1982. The Theory of Sex Allocation. Princeton University Press: Princeton, New Jersey.
  • Sakai, S., and Y. Harada. 1998. Does the trade-off between growth and reproduction select for male-biased sexual allocation in cosexual plants? Evolution 52:1204-1207.
  • Seger, J., and V. M. Eckhart. 1996. Evolution of sexual systems and sex allocation in plants when growth and reproduction overlap. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 263:833-841.